DE eng

Search in the Catalogues and Directories

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...7
Hits 1 – 20 of 121

1
Parameter hierarchies and universal grammar
Roberts, Ian G.. - Oxford : Oxford Univ. Press, 2019
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Show details
2
The wonders of language : or how to make noises and influence people
Roberts, Ian G.. - Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 2017
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
3
The Oxford handbook of universal grammar
Roberts, Ian G.. - Oxford : Oxford University Press, 2017
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
4
The wonders of language : or how to make noises and influence people
Roberts, Ian G.. - Singapore : Cambridge University Press, 2017
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
5
The final-over-final condition : a syntactic universal
Biberauer, Theresa; Sheehan, Michelle; Holmberg, Anders. - London, England : The MIT Press, 2017
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
6
The mystery of the overlooked discipline: modern syntactic theory and cognitive science
In: Revue roumaine de linguistique. - Bucureşti : Ed. Academiei Române 59 (2014) 2, 151-178
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
7
The Routledge handbook of syntax
Van Valin, Robert D.; Roberts, Ian G.; Truswell, Robert. - London [u.a.] : Routledge, 2014
BLLDB
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
8
A Syntactic Universal and Its Consequences
In: Linguistic inquiry. - Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Pr. 45 (2014) 2, 169-225
OLC Linguistik
Show details
9
On recursion
Watumull, Jeffrey; Hauser, Marc D.; Roberts, Ian G.. - : Frontiers Media S.A., 2014
BASE
Show details
10
Challenges to Linearization
Biberauer, Theresa [Herausgeber]; Roberts, Ian G. [Herausgeber]. - Berlin/Boston : De Gruyter, 2013
DNB Subject Category Language
Show details
11
The syntax-morphology relation
In: Lingua <Amsterdam>. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 130 (2013), 111-131
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
12
Some speculations on the development of the Romance periphrastic perfect
In: Revue roumaine de linguistique. - Bucureşti : Ed. Academiei Române 58 (2013) 1, 3-30
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
13
On recursion
In: Frontiers (2013)
Abstract: It is a truism that conceptual understanding of a hypothesis is required for its empirical investigation. However, the concept of recursion as articulated in the context of linguistic analysis has been perennially confused. Nowhere has this been more evident than in attempts to critique and extend Hauseretal's. (2002) articulation. These authors put forward the hypothesis that what is uniquely human and unique to the faculty of language—the faculty of language in the narrow sense (FLN)—is a recursive system that generates and maps syntactic objects to conceptual-intentional and sensory-motor systems. This thesis was based on the standard mathematical definition of recursion as understood by Gödel and Turing, and yet has commonly been interpreted in other ways, most notably and incorrectly as a thesis about the capacity for syntactic embedding. As we explain, the recursiveness of a function is defined independent of such output, whether infinite or finite, embedded or unembedded—existent or non-existent. And to the extent that embedding is a sufficient, though not necessary, diagnostic of recursion, it has not been established that the apparent restriction on embedding in some languages is of any theoretical import. Misunderstanding of these facts has generated research that is often irrelevant to the FLN thesis as well as to other theories of language competence that focus on its generative power of expression. This essay is an attempt to bring conceptual clarity to such discussions as well as to future empirical investigations by explaining three criterial properties of recursion: computability (i.e., rules in intension rather than lists in extension); definition by induction (i.e., rules strongly generative of structure); and mathematical induction (i.e., rules for the principled—and potentially unbounded—expansion of strongly generated structure). By these necessary and sufficient criteria, the grammars of all natural languages are recursive.
URL: http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/85687
BASE
Hide details
14
Non-arguments about non-universals : [the universals debate, apropos of Dunn, Greenhill, Levinson & Gray 2011]
In: Linguistic typology. - Berlin [u.a.] : Mouton de Gruyter 15 (2011) 2, 483-495
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
15
Agreement and head movement : clitics, incorporation, and defective goals
Roberts, Ian G.. - Cambridge, Mass. [u.a.] : The MIT Press, 2010
Leibniz-Zentrum Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft
Show details
16
Noam Chomsky and language descriptions
Askedal, John Ole; Roberts, Ian G. (Herausgeber); Matsushita, Tomonori. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : John Benjamins Pub. Co., 2010
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
17
Agreement and head movement : clitics, incorporation, and defective goals
Roberts, Ian G.. - Cambridge, Mass. : MIT Press, 2010
UB Frankfurt Linguistik
Show details
18
Agreement and head movement : clitics, incorporation, and defective goals electronic resource
Roberts, Ian G.. - Cambridge, Massachusetts : MIT Press, 2010, [2010]©2010
MPI für Psycholinguistik
Show details
19
Universals, diversity and change in the science of language: reaction to "The Myth of Language Universals and Cognitive Science"
In: Lingua <Amsterdam>. - Amsterdam [u.a.] : Elsevier 120 (2010) 12, 2699-2703
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details
20
Comments on Jäger "Anything is nothing is something": on the diachrony of polarity types of indefinites
In: Natural language & linguistic theory. - Dordrecht [u.a.] : Springer 28 (2010) 4, 823-836
BLLDB
OLC Linguistik
Show details

Page: 1 2 3 4 5...7

Catalogues
29
7
9
0
1
1
5
Bibliographies
84
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
12
Linked Open Data catalogues
0
Online resources
0
0
0
0
Open access documents
2
0
0
0
0
© 2013 - 2024 Lin|gu|is|tik | Imprint | Privacy Policy | Datenschutzeinstellungen ändern